Skip to main content

UNclear NUclear


The DRAFT of the N-Deal has been leaked and now the Govt. has made it public, the draft says that India can place few Select reactors where the Nuclear fuel will be enriched for civilian purposes under the purview of the IAEA. The deal ensures India adequate supply of Nuclear fuel, but does not specify the sources for doing so, the NSG member countries are governed by the NPT and it has nothing to do with regulation of the nuclear fuel prices unlike the OPEC (the Governing body of Petroleum Produce).




The Image that has painted by the Govt. for the public is that of a well informed move by the govt, risking its own majority for the better of the common man. From a skeptical point of view, look at the timing of approaching IAEA with the draft, the Country is to face general elections in about 10 months from now, although the Govt. can scrap through with the support of SP, if in case it fails to prove the majority, the Govt. the can continue in the office as minority or as a caretaker Govt according to the will of the PRESIDENT (no not Sonia Gandhi, Prathiba Patil the President of INDIA), and the Congress can put up a Brave face and begin propaganda for elections projecting Ms Gandhi and Manmohan Singh as decorated war heroes. For the LEFT, it had played story of the Wolf and the Shepard, but has finally ended its alliance with Govt. though they knew it was coming for the last 2 and a half years, thus they’ve have categorically opposed the deal, and have saved some pride for their crucial elections in WB and Kerala.



For the comment regarding that no other govt would implement such a deal, yes of course no govt would plunge into a crucial deal by keeping its populace in the dark. It looks much like personal promise on behalf of the nation, just for sense of argument, 10 years down the line if the cost of the Nuclear fuel increases stupendously where do we go to buy it in the open market. Australia, a key member of the NSG and a major source of Nuclear Fuel has already stated that it would not sell unless India signs the NPT and CTBT, this is the sort of black mailing I’m foreseeing from the US and other nations. Its such a joke, BUSH praising MMS for his “leader”ship (may be he meant SONIA GANDHI), a mockery of his sense of DIPLOMACY.



What ever may be the outcome of the deal, the manner in which it has been done and implemented is apprehensive.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Anniversary with the Adversary

Feb 14 th evoked a lot of mixed and vexed emotions in me, not for the reason that I share my first name with the culture honcho Muthalik, but it was exactly a year before this Date, I met ‘HER’…. Yes HER refers to that special someone…. Many of you might know her, she’s pretty famous these days, but what u wouldn’t know is that I’m dating her… No, she’s not BulBul… This post is a Memoir of the bygone year with her, a repertoire of experiences she’s enriched me with… I intended to post on Valentine's Day itself, but because of the demanding nature of hers I was forced to stay away from the internet, and celebrate our anniversary elsewhere. I met her, for the first time on Feb 13 2008, She was at the HR room in the 5 th floor of my office, waiting for me there; after a couple of mins of talk, I sensed we were getting closer, I didn’t expect that it would be such, that she would be mine henceforth. I felt a Déjà vu when I saw her, I felt I had met her befor
10 comments
Read more

Bharatha as I see it..

I’m writing this post, inspired by a whatsapp argument I had with my bunch of friends. I wanted to pen my thoughts independent of an argument cause its easier to be carried away by the heat of the argument and one might misquote or misinterpret one’s understanding of a subject as grey as the Mahabharata. The main issue of contention was that the idea of Kauravas vs the Pandavas, and how the whole of Mahabharatha was biased towards glorifying the Pandavas. My friends also opined that Pandavas had no legal right over the throne of Kuru vamsha.  I would like to clarify that Pandavas never staked claim to the throne of Hastinapur, being valid and rightful Princes of the Kuru vamsha they sought rightful co-existence with the Kauravas. The only rightful character in the whole of Mahabharata after Shantanu who had all the qualities of a King but choose to forego the same over a promise he had made to his father and step-mother Bhishma was supposed to take care of both Dritharastra’s and
3 comments
Read more

Life in a Belly!!

We are gifted unlike other animals to perform different tasks that are beyond our natural abilities and habitat and also live a life out the physical, mental, geographical and intellectual boundaries of birth. We basically have an option to live a life and adopt a lifestyle that we wish to, unlike our lesser privileged subordinates of the evolution tree. We can be a fish that swims; an ape that jumps; a bird that flies or a bull that tows and tugs, and drive by this need or feel we are or we wish to be something and somebody our body and mind is comfortable with, and it should remain so. Animals on the other hand do not enjoy this freedom, they are anatomical and physically of the same build, and irrespective of their emotional need they are bound be restricted by certain limitations of their physiology. There are no skinny elephants, or fat lions or furry lizards, unless of course their geographical and evolutionary needs drive them to mutate into another species altogether.
2 comments
Read more