Skip to main content

A Certain Kind

A certain kind succeed, indeed.

It takes special people to take simple activities like hard-work, sincerity and commitment to one's objectives and make them special, and achieve what others have not achieved (keeping aside moral compass of good or bad). It takes special interest and passion to catapult oneself into bigger platitudes and become noticeable and more important to disrupt the established ways of life. They are often the people who inspire happiness and also the ones who contribute to the successes of various other persons who belong to the same kind. These people can live off of their dreams and goals, and the rush of achieving them, there are not here to survive but they are here to succeed, to change the earth, to break the establishment and often be what the want to be, or more than that, they hardly ever let an opportunity bypass them and if there are no opportunities they will carve out one. These kind aren't fazed by the judgement and scrutiny others and do not essentially heed to the set norms of the Society in being who they are and are more than happy to do so, and they are of a certain kind.


A certain kind survive.

Though it sounds mundane, these are the people the out number the successful people, they do not take as many risks and aren't as driven by passion of their dreams as the successful, but are the people that drive the society as it is. They may not win the race, and may not even participate in it; but there's no race if there are survivors. They may deny their own objectives and dreams to pursue and protect their perceived responsibilities. They might not essential inspire happiness, but deep down they are happy to be who they are, catering to their basic needs of social and biological life. They might not be celebrated as much as the successful, but they are the ones who celebrate the successful. They might be OK to have let go of opportunity in order to sustain their life or lifestyle. They are the compliant and compilers of the norms of the society, and strive greatly to fit into the framework of these norms and are happy to do so, and they too are of a certain kind.

So, a Certain Kind Survive, and a Certain Kind Succeed; and I am kind of  Uncertain.

Comments

  1. What is the minimum bet on roulette? | Dr. Dr. Maryland
    Minimum 구리 출장마사지 Bet on Roulette. 1. The 태백 출장마사지 minimum bet is divided 광주 출장샵 into 2 bets. The second bet is on 평택 출장안마 the dealer to 상주 출장안마 win. The third bet is the

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Anniversary with the Adversary

Feb 14 th evoked a lot of mixed and vexed emotions in me, not for the reason that I share my first name with the culture honcho Muthalik, but it was exactly a year before this Date, I met ‘HER’…. Yes HER refers to that special someone…. Many of you might know her, she’s pretty famous these days, but what u wouldn’t know is that I’m dating her… No, she’s not BulBul… This post is a Memoir of the bygone year with her, a repertoire of experiences she’s enriched me with… I intended to post on Valentine's Day itself, but because of the demanding nature of hers I was forced to stay away from the internet, and celebrate our anniversary elsewhere. I met her, for the first time on Feb 13 2008, She was at the HR room in the 5 th floor of my office, waiting for me there; after a couple of mins of talk, I sensed we were getting closer, I didn’t expect that it would be such, that she would be mine henceforth. I felt a Déjà vu when I saw her, I felt I had met her befor

Bharatha as I see it..

I’m writing this post, inspired by a whatsapp argument I had with my bunch of friends. I wanted to pen my thoughts independent of an argument cause its easier to be carried away by the heat of the argument and one might misquote or misinterpret one’s understanding of a subject as grey as the Mahabharata. The main issue of contention was that the idea of Kauravas vs the Pandavas, and how the whole of Mahabharatha was biased towards glorifying the Pandavas. My friends also opined that Pandavas had no legal right over the throne of Kuru vamsha.  I would like to clarify that Pandavas never staked claim to the throne of Hastinapur, being valid and rightful Princes of the Kuru vamsha they sought rightful co-existence with the Kauravas. The only rightful character in the whole of Mahabharata after Shantanu who had all the qualities of a King but choose to forego the same over a promise he had made to his father and step-mother Bhishma was supposed to take care of both Dritharastra’s and

Life in a Belly!!

We are gifted unlike other animals to perform different tasks that are beyond our natural abilities and habitat and also live a life out the physical, mental, geographical and intellectual boundaries of birth. We basically have an option to live a life and adopt a lifestyle that we wish to, unlike our lesser privileged subordinates of the evolution tree. We can be a fish that swims; an ape that jumps; a bird that flies or a bull that tows and tugs, and drive by this need or feel we are or we wish to be something and somebody our body and mind is comfortable with, and it should remain so. Animals on the other hand do not enjoy this freedom, they are anatomical and physically of the same build, and irrespective of their emotional need they are bound be restricted by certain limitations of their physiology. There are no skinny elephants, or fat lions or furry lizards, unless of course their geographical and evolutionary needs drive them to mutate into another species altogether.